Libros de Sociología del mundo, página 46 de 1590

<,font face=",Times New Roman", size=",3",>, The history of the United States in the last thirty years, its preoccupation with the Vietnam War and the devastating affects of that war on the psyche of this nation is evidence of a foreign policy tragedy. Foreign policy tragedy brings domestic tragedy in its wake. The purpose of this study is to work out why the approaches to social revolution--and that is what the Vietnam War was about--have been wrong on both sides of the ideological spectrum the last thirty years in the U.S., point out why they were wrong, point to where they were wrong, and point to the consequences of acting in a society when the perceptions are in certain respects wrong.<,br>,<,br>, Let me sum up my perception on what went wrong in Vietnam. It was a Right wing war fought on Left wing premises. It was a war that could not have been won because those who designed it would not or could not win it--but were also afraid of losing it. It was a war that was wrongly perceived by both sides of the ideological spectrum. <,br>,<,br>, <,hr>, <,br>,<,br>, The Liberal argument was that America tried everything and still lost it! <,br>,<,br>, The Conservative argument was that it could have been won if the opposition had not tied their hands, keeping them from an all out effort that would have been required to win it. <,br>,<,br>, The war was started in earnest by the Liberals under Kennedy. The strategy was to roll up the enemy by hitting on the peasant and through it, cut off the leaders. Pacification, education, re-education, indoctrination, and the introduction of self-defense techniques to the South Vietnamese peasants was meant to stop the revolution exported from the North in its tracks. The U.S. policy was predicated on the assumption that the peasants really had something to do with the ruling functions of the North Vietnamese revolution after Thermidor, that after the onse

El mundo actual está plagado de pantallas y escribir en ellas demanda una sensibilidad particular. Con rigurosidad y encanto, Silvia Ramírez Gelbes entiende los vertiginosos cambios que se están dando en la comunicacion, tanto publica como privada, y con este libro se propone desarrollar, entre la teoria y la practica, las aptitudes necesarias para la produccion de contenido eficiente en el entorno digital. En un ecosistema donde manejar las normas de etiqueta tiene tanta importancia como los conocimientos de gramatica en el dificil arte de hacerse entender, El discurso hibrido funciona como una herramienta imprescindible para periodistas, publicistas, community managers, tuiteros, trendsetters, influencers, asesores de imagen, diseñadores, profesores y estudiantes.

COMUNICACION PARA CAMBIO SOCIAL PROPUESTAS PARA ACCION es un libro del autor IRANZO,AMADOR editado por TIRANT HUMANIDADES. COMUNICACION PARA CAMBIO SOCIAL PROPUESTAS PARA ACCION tiene un ci¿digo EAN 9788417706104, de la coleccii¿n CIENCIAS DE LA COMUNICACION y consta de 259 pi¿ginas.

Cada país tiene sus colores. En este cuento nos daremos cuenta.

L'auteur montre que la mondialisation conduit à l'édification d'une élite minoritaire dans un monde où le marché prend le pas sur le politique, affaiblissant l'Etat-nation et faisant subir à une gran

.

De com l’educació condiciona la família, l’escola i el treball.Temps d’educar és un recull de treballs sobre el temps i l’educació. Educar requereix temps. Educar requereix una bona gestió del temps.

In surrealist artist Paul Klee s The Twittering Machine, the bird-song of a diabolical machine acts as bait to lure humankind into a pit of damnation. Leading political writer and broadcaster Richard Seymour, author of Corbyn: The Strange Rebirth of Radical Politics argues that this is a chilling metaphor for our relationship with social media.Former social media executives tell us that the system is an addiction-machine. We are users, waiting for our next hit as we like, comment and share. We write to the machine as individuals, but it responds by aggregating our fantasies, desires and frailties into data, and returning them to us as a commodity experience.Through journalism, psychoanalytic reflection and insights from users, developers, security experts and others, Seymour probes the human side of the machine, asking what we re getting out of it, and what we re getting into.A brilliant, urgent, game-changing intervention. China Mieville, author of October: The Story of the Russian Revolution Richard Seymour has a brilliant mind and a compelling style. Everything he writes is worth reading. Gary Younge, Editor-at-Large, GuardianThis is a story about desire and violence, as well as writing. It is also a story about what we might be writing ourselves into, culturally and politically. It is not an authoritative accout: that is impossible this early in the evolution of a radically new technopolitical system. This book is an attempt, as much as anything else, to work out a new langauge for thinking about what is coming into being . . .